The fourteenth amendment states that, "no State shall make or enforce any law which shall...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The three types of scrutiny used by courts to rule on Equal Protection Clause cases are strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny and rational basis. For strict scrutiny the action must be necessary and there must be no other way to accomplish the objective. Strict scrutiny is used any time a fundamental right is in question. Intermediate scrutiny does not require that the government's objectives be compelling, but they must be important. Rational basis requires only that the government has a legitimate reason for the action even if the courts do not agree with the rationality.
Sport Law related article of the week: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6267354
Retired NFL players are suing the NFL in an attempt to join the current players' antitrust suit against the league. The retired players are concerned about losing their health benefits under the new CBA.
From the article:
"The retirees want the NFL lockout lifted to ensure their pensions and health benefits remain funded. According to the lawsuit, those benefits will end if a collective bargaining agreement is not renewed by next March 11 -- a year after the last one expired."
The retired players are hoping to get their voices heard in the negotiations.